p-Index From 2019 - 2024
6.572
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Jurnal Borneo Administrator: Media Pengembangan Paradigma dan Inovasi Sistem Administrasi Negara Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial budaya Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JISIP) JURNAL SOSIAL HUMANIORA (JSH) JIPAGS (Journal of Indonesian Public Administration and Governance Studies) Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP) JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik Universitas Medan Area Sumatra Journal of Disaster, Geography and Geography Education Jurnal Bina Praja Syntax Literate : Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik (JIAP) Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan JAKP (Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik) Reformasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jurnal Public Policy Transparansi Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Societas : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Sosial International Journal of Agricultural Sciences Musamus Journal of Public Administration Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Ministrate: Jurnal Birokrasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah Journal of Public Administration and Government (JPAG) Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences JOELS: Journal of Election and Leadership Warta Pengabdian Andalas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengembangan Dan Penerapan Ipteks Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Kebijakan (JPK) Jurnal Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Jurnal Manajemen dan Ilmu Administrasi Publik (JMIAP) BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi SIMBOL : Jurnal Administrasi Publik dan Pemerintahan Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, dan Akuntansi) Jurnal Kebijskan Pembangunan Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi (JIEE)
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara

The Role of the Inspectorate of West Pasaman Regency in Maintaining Unqualified Opinion (WTP) through the Review of Work Plans and Budgets (RKA) Zakiah Darajat; Hendri Koeswara; Desna Aromatica
Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara Vol 15, No 2 (2023): Pemikiran Administrasi Negara 6
Publisher : Department of Public Administration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jpan.v15i2.28716

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to describe and analyze the RKA review conducted by the West Pasaman District Inspectorate. In analyzing this research, the researcher used Permendagari Number 10 of 2018 concerning the Review of Development Planning Documents and the Annual Regional Budget, which is in the RKA review stage, where there is a Planning, Implementation and Reporting process. This type of research is qualitative with a descriptive approach. Interview data collection techniques, documentation and observation. Informants were selected using a purposive sampling technique. Data analysis used is data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. Data validation uses source triangulation. The results of the study show that the Inspectorate of West Pasaman Regency has guided Permendagri No. 10 of 2018 in general in implementing the RKA review as one of the supports for obtaining Unqualified opinion (WTP) by West Pasaman Regency, because planning needs to be considered early in anticipation of the occurrence of budgetary waste that can be detrimental to the region. The problems found in the implementation of this RKA review were the preparation of the Review Work Program (PRK) carried out by team members, in addition to that the implementation of the RKA review was not in accordance with the time specified in the Assignment Letter (SPT), due to the lengthy submission of supporting documents review by SKPD. However, there are still advantages to be gained from carrying out the RKA review at the West Pasaman District Inspectorate such as the implementation of Self-Office Training (PKS) in budget savings and the existence of tiered reviews in the implementation and reporting stages.